He won't, he'll just need to report it to the police. Remember the features etc. This is minor compared to the mass shooting. It's the mass shooting that I'm referring to. Have you read the news? Kids going out into the streets using guns stolen from their parents. If the gun law was implemented, would they still have the opportunity to get them? That's a question for you to ponder about.
Yeah but, what if it WAS something bigger? That was just an example, what if he is held hostage laying on the floor at gun-point, with about, 20 other citizens, he could get up and shoot the man (if he has good reflexes or something idk :P), BUT he doesn't have his gun because it was taken away, there is a risk he could get shot in someone doesn't obey, reply or whatever.
Exactly, so that's what they're debating about. As you can see, it's two-sided. Both has its pros and cons. It's been the 174rd mass shooting this year in America alone. Guns, after all, are double-edged swords.
A good citizen can take down a bad citizen with a gun, even if that bad citizen has another gun, but if we take away guns, the bad citizen will still be roaming and free at that time to do ANOTHER mass-shooting, the good citizen could've stopped, if there were no gun laws.
No, they're criminals, they don't care, they will still have guns, buy them illegally, doesn't matter, people with intention to kill, will kill, if you remove gun laws, the good citizens won't have anything to protect them from criminals, a good guy with a gun, can take down a bad guy with a gun.
Japanese, they are examples which were made up by a weeabo. You'll most probably end up sprawled in your own pool of blood after defending against the gunman. Kids rampaging the streets because they used their parent's guns which was meant to keep them safe and you want to keep guns?
I won't be carrying a gun, I am only 14, my mama or papa will have the gun, The gunman, could be taken down with a good guy with a gun, There are heroes in the world who do take down these kinds of people, my "examples" have happened in America many, many times, and taking away guns would be hard, almost everyone in America has a gun,
People are not caring HOW to stop the Mass-shootings, every time it's just take away more guns. Take the Christina Grimmie case, he carried 2 pistols and a Knife, even if guns were taken, he still would of killed her, that will still happen, murderers will kill, people with intention to harm, will harm, it's not taking away the guns, it's how to stop the Mass-shootings itself.
Still, will the other stuff I said, there is nothing of that fact about how to stop these mass-shootings, or make it harder to get guns, for what we know the mass-shootings may increase, I don't think you should take away gun control, just try to stop these mass-shootings and make it harder to get guns. End.
You will be surprised that certain 14 year olds have already began their killing spree with (drumroll) guns!
Gun ban anyone?
Anyway I guess we'll be seeing Japanese protecting people with a gun.
And as blueberry said, Guns can kill people faster than choppers.
Yeah, it should be harder to get guns, if they made it harder, then 15 year olds won't have guns to kill people, Murderers don't care about how fast you can kill people, no one else really cares either, And there are people who will protect, not everyone is bad, people do protect.
Except it does matter to them. Killing someone with a knife is much slower than killing them with a gun. Murderers wouldn't be satisfied with just a few people, they want to kill as many people as possible before the police arrive.
We people are not as grand as you think. No one carries guns around with them with the chance that they may be able to stop someone. That doesn't happen. People do not protect, and it's time we enforced some gun laws that are actually effective.
People should enforce gun laws, but not fully take them away, people do carry guns to protect if anything bad happens, just with a few incidents of shootings were people didn't have guns to protect themselves, doesn't mean nobody has them, There should be gun laws, but just not fully take them away from everyone, we still need them.
If no one has guns, there are no shootings. We don't guns. You do not depend on them heavily in your life.
No guns = no harm
If there were no guns, no one has to run around supposedly being the good guy with guns and saving everyone. Besides, even though you say people carry around guns to protect themselves and others from mass shootings, that's something out of a book. Doesn't actually happen. Get real.
Even single time there's a mass-shooting, it's just "take away guns" "more guns", there is NOTHING about how to stop them, To stop people from Mass-shooters, about everyone In America has a gun, if you don't think that do research, they would need to take away all those guns, and mass-shooters would still have the guns, they can't take away EVERY single gun, and good citizens will turn them I or whatever I don't know
There would probably be more mass-shootings, and muggers, robbers, murderers would increase, because no guns, no protections, no risk of being shot by a citizen, that is why there are gun laws.
And bad guys don't care if they break a single law of having a gun, and it is blatantly obvious that other illegal activity will increase, there would be more crimes the there would've been if they ever take away guns.
Australia did it. The crime went down by a lot. And don't say taking away guns is a bad idea, because it's not. Like I've stated before, since you seem to be IGNORING THIS SPECIFIC POINT, there are no instances when people are carrying around guns to protect themselves. That could happen in some other world, but the idea that that would happen is RIDICULOUS. SO DROP IT.
LIKE I SAY IN EVERY SINGLE DANG POST, people don't carry around guns to protect themselves nowadays. Also, what evidence do you have that the crime rate will rise? NONE. If you do, speak up. You say it's "blatantly obvious" but it really isn't. Crime rates won't rise if guns are taken away. That's RIDICULOUS.
"that's why there are gun laws" HMM WELL THEY OBVIOUSLY AREN'T WORKING SINCE THERE HAVE BEEN SO MANY SHOOTINGS. :/
Sorry I'm just kind of mad that I can't get into your thick skull how dumb your arguments are.
No protection, no risks of you getting shot, crime rate will raise, if you did research it IS obvious, in THIS world, there are people who have/carry guns, once again, do research, it is blatantly obvious that crime rate will raise, because of what I said, there is no risk of the citizen having a gun, because it would be illegal, so other crime will be increased, it is blatantly OBVIOUS
I don't understand why you don't get it. there have been more mass shootings in the US than there have been days. Do you not think this is a problem? Are you 5? And you're telling me " Keep gun laws, people need them, :P." So we're going to keep the gun laws, even though we've had so many shootings? Are you oblivious to the outside world? If you don't change any laws, no outcomes will change.
Okay, this is retarded, fighting over gun laws on a Minecraft forums, that's immature, I am done on this argument, it's idiotic, it will end up how it is, And I am done here.
It's retarded, fighting over it on a Minecraft forums, I never said that to everyone that died, the argument, on a Minecraft forums, is retarded, it's stupid to go on, because it's a Minecraft forums, Not the people who died, never said anything to them, the argument is retarded, that has nothing to do with those people that died,
It's not a retarded argument. Please stop saying retarded. Retarded is a word used to describe people with mental disabilities, and using that word is an insult to them. Stop being so insensitive.
It's not to someone with mental disabilities if it's towards an argument, I never said the argument and the reason for the argument is stupid, I am saying it is stupid when it's on a Minecraft forums. And it is, arguing on a Minecraft forums.
It would be stupid if we were arguing about something stupid. But this argument is a real issue. Besides, I don't see any problem with arguing about it on a minecraft forum. I know there should be an obvious reason why it's stupid, but the more I think about it, there's nothing really stupid about it.
Comments on Profile Post by Tyler